RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 4GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 8GB

Crucial Technology BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 4GB vs Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

22 31

Around 29% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.1 13.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLE4G4D26AFEA.8FBD 4GB

Corsair CMK16GX4M2E3200C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3012 3341

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns