RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB vs Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CVF 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB vs Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CVF 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Reasons to consider
Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CVF 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 31

Around -11% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.4 17

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.5 12.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

23400 19200

Around 1.22 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D240FSB.16FD 16GB

Samsung M378A1K43EB2-CVF 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-23400, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 19-19-19, 20-20-20, 21-21-21, 22-22-22 / 2933 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3282 3419

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns