RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 8GB vs Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 8GB

Crucial Technology BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 8GB vs Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 8GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

31 37

Around -19% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.9 15.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FAD 8GB

Kingston 99U5702-095.A00G 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2813 2990

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns