RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB vs Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB vs Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Reasons to consider
Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 34

Around -17% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.8 10.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Kingston KF548C38-16 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 38
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2795 3319

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns