RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN 16GB vs SK Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-WM 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN 16GB vs SK Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-WM 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

34 43

Around 21% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.4 15

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

16.1 13.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 23400

Around 1.09% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
SK Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-WM 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD832A.C16FN 16GB

SK Hynix HMA82GS6DJR8N-WM 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC4-23400, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 19-19-19, 20-20-20, 21-21-21, 22-22-22 / 2933 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3324 2794

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns