RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 32GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5210ME88HCF-3200 32GB

Crucial Technology CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 32GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5210ME88HCF-3200 32GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 32GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 32GB

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5210ME88HCF-3200 32GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.8 14.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 32GB

Ramaxel Technology RMUA5210ME88HCF-3200 32GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3407 2950

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns