Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB vs Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    62 left arrow 63
    Around 2% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 14.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 12.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 6400
    Around 4 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AC800.C16FC 4GB
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    62 left arrow 63
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,670.6 left arrow 14.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,378.6 left arrow 12.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    861 left arrow 2543
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons