Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB
Crucial Technology BL32G32C16U4W.M16FB1 32GB

Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB vs Crucial Technology BL32G32C16U4W.M16FB1 32GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB

Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BL32G32C16U4W.M16FB1 32GB

Crucial Technology BL32G32C16U4W.M16FB1 32GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    3 left arrow 17.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    29 left arrow 79
    Around -172% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    16.0 left arrow 1,468.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 6400
    Around 3.33 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Qimonda 64T128020EDL2.5C2 1GB
Crucial Technology BL32G32C16U4W.M16FB1 32GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    79 left arrow 29
  • Read speed, GB/s
    3,061.8 left arrow 17.9
  • Write speed, GB/s
    1,468.1 left arrow 16.0
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    6400 left arrow 21300
Other
  • Description
    PC2-6400, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 4 5 6 left arrow PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 800 MHz left arrow 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    422 left arrow 3795
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons