Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB vs Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    42 left arrow 63
    Around 33% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 13.3
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    12.7 left arrow 7.8
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 21300
    Around 1.2 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Ramaxel Technology RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 8GB
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    42 left arrow 63
  • Read speed, GB/s
    13.3 left arrow 14.7
  • Write speed, GB/s
    7.8 left arrow 12.7
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    21300 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
  • Timings / Clock speed
    17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2181 left arrow 2543
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons