RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB vs Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

10.4 9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

8.5 5.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3020EC58E9F1333 4GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4S240FSD.16FAD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1274 1858

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns