Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 16GB

Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB vs Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB

Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 16GB

Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 16GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    3 left arrow 17.3
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    2,622.0 left arrow 13.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    32 left arrow 77
    Around -141% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 5300
    Around 3.21 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Samsung M3 93T5750CZA-CE6 2GB
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    77 left arrow 32
  • Read speed, GB/s
    3,405.2 left arrow 17.3
  • Write speed, GB/s
    2,622.0 left arrow 13.4
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    5300 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC2-5300, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 667 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    763 left arrow 3422
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons