RAM comparison Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 8GB vs Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

32 38

Around 16% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

16.6 15.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.1 9.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 8GB

Crucial Technology CT2K102464BD160B 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3009 2566

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns