RAM comparison Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8GB vs Crucial Technology BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 8GB

Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8GB vs Crucial Technology BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

19.1 18.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 17000

Around 1.25 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 8GB

Crucial Technology BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3454 3363

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns