RAM comparison Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

19.4 18.1

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.5 14.2

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 17000

Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3550 3526

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns