RAM comparison Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB vs ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB vs ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

Reasons to consider
ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

37 38

Around -3% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

21.4 13.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.3 8.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 10600

Around 1.81 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2GB

ATP Electronics Inc. X4C16QE8BNRCME-E-LI1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 8 9 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2106 3448

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns