RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.9 17.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 17000

Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3705 3184

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns