Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB vs Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    26 left arrow 34
    Around 24% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 13.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    18.9 left arrow 17.9
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.51 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology BLT16G4D30AETA.K16FB 16GB
Ramaxel Technology RMUA5200MR78HAF-3200 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    26 left arrow 34
  • Read speed, GB/s
    17.9 left arrow 18.9
  • Write speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 13.4
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    17000 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28
  • Timings / Clock speed
    14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3705 left arrow 3184
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons