RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB vs Elpida EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB vs Elpida EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F 16GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 59

Around 59% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.4 4.3

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.3 2.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 12800

Around 1.5% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Elpida EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Elpida EBJ17RG4BBWD-GN-F 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3392 839

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns