RAM comparison Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB vs Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Overall score

Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

31 41

Around 24% lower latency
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston 9965669-018.A00G 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2460 2302

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns