RAM comparison Kingston ACR32D4S2S8ME-16 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Kingston ACR32D4S2S8ME-16 16GB vs Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Overall score

Kingston ACR32D4S2S8ME-16 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston ACR32D4S2S8ME-16 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.1 16.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 21300

Around 1.2% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston ACR32D4S2S8ME-16 16GB

Crucial Technology BL16G26C16U4W.16FD 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2668 3477

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns