RAM comparison Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB vs Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

186 374

Around 50% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

3.9 0.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

2.0 1.0

Average value in the tests

Reasons to consider
Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Kingston 99U5701-036.A00G 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Timings / Clock speed

14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz 15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

536 269

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns