RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB vs OCZ OCZ3BE1600C8LV2G 2GB

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB vs OCZ OCZ3BE1600C8LV2G 2GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

24 63

Around 62% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.5 6.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

11.0 4.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 8500

Around 2.26% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
OCZ OCZ3BE1600C8LV2G 2GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 4GB

OCZ OCZ3BE1600C8LV2G 2GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20 PC3-8500, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1066 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2445 1248

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns