Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB
Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB vs Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB

Differences

  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 19200
    Around 1.33% higher bandwidth
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    24 left arrow 63
    Around -163% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    14.8 left arrow 14.7
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    13.0 left arrow 12.7
    Average value in the tests

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Neo Forza GKE160SO204808-3200 16GB
Kingston KF560C40-16 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR4 left arrow DDR5
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    63 left arrow 24
  • Read speed, GB/s
    14.7 left arrow 14.8
  • Write speed, GB/s
    12.7 left arrow 13.0
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 19200
Other
  • Description
    PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 left arrow PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42
  • Timings / Clock speed
    20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz left arrow no data / 2400 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2543 left arrow 3524
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons