RAM comparison Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB vs Inmos + 256MB

Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB vs Inmos + 256MB

Overall score

Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Reasons to consider
Inmos + 256MB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

30 40

Around -33% lower latency
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.1 7.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

16800 12800

Around 1.31 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Ramaxel Technology RMT3160ED58E9W1600 4GB

Inmos + 256MB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC4-16800, TBD1 V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 20
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz no data
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1806 2318

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns