RAM comparison Samsung 9905599-020.A00G 16GB vs Samsung 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 16GB

Samsung 9905599-020.A00G 16GB vs Samsung 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 16GB

Overall score

Samsung 9905599-020.A00G 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Samsung 9905599-020.A00G 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 32

Around 19% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.6 9.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

13.2 8.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Samsung 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Samsung 9905599-020.A00G 16GB

Samsung 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G1B1 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2783 2271

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns