RAM comparison Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U0830160B 8GB vs Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C38 16GB

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U0830160B 8GB vs Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C38 16GB

Overall score

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U0830160B 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U0830160B 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

17.4 15.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

21300 19200

Around 1.11% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C38 16GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Chun Well Technology Holding Limited D4U0830160B 8GB

Corsair CMT32GX5M2B5200C38 16GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-21300, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42
Timings / Clock speed

17-17-17, 18-18-18, 19-19-19, 20-20-20 / 2666 MHz no data / 2400 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3137 3351

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns