RAM comparison Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 8GB

Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB vs Crucial Technology CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 8GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.3 12.6

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.1 8.3

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

17000 12800

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMSO4GX3M1C1600C11 4GB

Crucial Technology CT8G4SFD8213.C16FDD2 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 9 11 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2112 2539

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns