Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB
Corsair CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB vs Corsair CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 8GB

Corsair CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 8GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    29 left arrow 40
    Around 28% lower latency
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    12.8 left arrow 12.1
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    9.4 left arrow 7.8
    Average value in the tests

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT102464BF160B-16F 8GB
Corsair CMSO8GX3M1C1600C11 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR3 left arrow DDR3
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    29 left arrow 40
  • Read speed, GB/s
    12.8 left arrow 12.1
  • Write speed, GB/s
    9.4 left arrow 7.8
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    12800 left arrow 12800
Other
  • Description
    PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11 left arrow PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 9 11
  • Timings / Clock speed
    9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz left arrow 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    2282 left arrow 2162
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons