Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB vs Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB

Differences

  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    24 left arrow 30
    Around 20% lower latency
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
    Around 1.13% higher bandwidth
  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    18.1 left arrow 14.4
    Average value in the tests
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.2 left arrow 12.3
    Average value in the tests

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT16G48C40U5.M8A1 16GB
Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 16GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR5 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    24 left arrow 30
  • Read speed, GB/s
    14.4 left arrow 18.1
  • Write speed, GB/s
    12.3 left arrow 14.2
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    19200 left arrow 17000
Other
  • Description
    PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 26 28 30 32 36 40 42 left arrow PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    no data / 2400 MHz left arrow 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    3392 left arrow 3550
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons