RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB vs Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 8GB

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB vs Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

19.4 18

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

15.5 13.8

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 17000

Around 1.51% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT16G4DFRA32A.C16FP 16GB

Corsair CMK8GX4M1E3200C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3526 3334

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns