RAM comparison Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2GB vs Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Overall score

Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2GB

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.8 11.8

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

9.0 8.4

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Kingston ASU1333D3S9DR8/2G 2GB

Crucial Technology CT51264BF160B.C16F 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 10 11
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1587 2011

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns