RAM comparison Unifosa Corporation GU512303EP0202 2GB vs Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 2GB

Unifosa Corporation GU512303EP0202 2GB vs Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 2GB

Overall score

Unifosa Corporation GU512303EP0202 2GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Unifosa Corporation GU512303EP0202 2GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

27 28

Around 4% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

12.9 12.7

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

7.7 7.5

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

10600 8500

Around 1.25% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 2GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Unifosa Corporation GU512303EP0202 2GB

Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 2GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9 PC3-8500, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8
Timings / Clock speed

7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1066 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

1930 1988

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns