RAM comparison Crucial Technology BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 16GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 16GB vs Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

29 186

Around 84% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

18.1 3.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.9 2.0

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 16GB

Corsair CMW32GX4M4K4266C19 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 28 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3673 536

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns