RAM comparison Gloway International Co. Ltd. TYP4U3200E16082C 8GB vs Corsair CMN16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Gloway International Co. Ltd. TYP4U3200E16082C 8GB vs Corsair CMN16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Overall score

Gloway International Co. Ltd. TYP4U3200E16082C 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Gloway International Co. Ltd. TYP4U3200E16082C 8GB

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMN16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

31 39

Around -26% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

20.6 17.5

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

14.7 10.6

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

25600 19200

Around 1.33 higher bandwidth

Complete list of technical specifications

Gloway International Co. Ltd. TYP4U3200E16082C 8GB

Corsair CMN16GX4M2Z3200C16 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC4-19200, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Timings / Clock speed

15-15-15, 16-16-16, 17-17-17, 18-18-18 / 2400 MHz 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2600 3367

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns