RAM comparison Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 16GB vs Kingston 9965589-030.D01G 8GB

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 16GB vs Kingston 9965589-030.D01G 8GB

Overall score

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 16GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 16GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

26 32

Around 19% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

14.4 9.9

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

12.8 8.9

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

19200 17000

Around 1.13% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Kingston 9965589-030.D01G 8GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Corsair CMK32GX5M2B5200C40 16GB

Kingston 9965589-030.D01G 8GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC5-19200, 1.1V, CAS Supported: 22 28 30 32 36 40 42 PC4-17000, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 9 11 12 13 14 15 16
Timings / Clock speed

no data / 2400 MHz 14-14-14, 15-15-15, 16-16-16 / 2133 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

3451 2332

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns