Crucial Technology CT51264AA667.M16FC 4GB
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3200C22 8GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AA667.M16FC 4GB vs Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3200C22 8GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Crucial Technology CT51264AA667.M16FC 4GB

Crucial Technology CT51264AA667.M16FC 4GB

Overall score
star star star star star
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3200C22 8GB

Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3200C22 8GB

Differences

  • Faster reading speed, GB/s
    4 left arrow 16.8
    Average value in the tests
  • Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns
    40 left arrow 58
    Around -45% lower latency
  • Faster write speed, GB/s
    14.0 left arrow 1,949.3
    Average value in the tests
  • Higher memory bandwidth, mbps
    25600 left arrow 5300
    Around 4.83 higher bandwidth

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications
Crucial Technology CT51264AA667.M16FC 4GB
Corsair CMSX16GX4M2A3200C22 8GB
Main characteristics
  • Memory type
    DDR2 left arrow DDR4
  • Latency in PassMark, ns
    58 left arrow 40
  • Read speed, GB/s
    4,463.9 left arrow 16.8
  • Write speed, GB/s
    1,949.3 left arrow 14.0
  • Memory bandwidth, mbps
    5300 left arrow 25600
Other
  • Description
    PC2-5300, SSTL 1.8V, CAS Supported: 3 4 5 left arrow PC4-25600, 1.2V, CAS Supported: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
  • Timings / Clock speed
    5-5-5-15 / 667 MHz left arrow 20-20-20, 22-22-22, 24-24-24 / 3200 MHz
  • Ranking PassMark (The more the better)
    803 left arrow 3015
RAM Latency Calculator
Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format
RAM 1
RAM 2

Latest comparisons