RAM comparison Crucial Technology CT102464BD160B 8GB vs Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Crucial Technology CT102464BD160B 8GB vs Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Overall score

Crucial Technology CT102464BD160B 8GB

Overall score

Differences Specifications Comments

Reasons to consider
Crucial Technology CT102464BD160B 8GB

Below the latency in the PassMark tests, ns

28 39

Around 28% lower latency
Faster reading speed, GB/s

15.3 14.2

Average value in the tests
Faster write speed, GB/s

10.2 8.7

Average value in the tests
Higher memory bandwidth, mbps

12800 10600

Around 1.21% higher bandwidth

Reasons to consider
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Complete list of technical specifications

Crucial Technology CT102464BD160B 8GB

Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 4GB

Main characteristics

Other

Description

PC3-12800, 1.5V, 1.35V , CAS Supported: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PC3-10600, 1.5V, CAS Supported: 6 7 8 9
Timings / Clock speed

9-9-9-24 / 1600 MHz 7-7-7-20 / 1333 MHz
Ranking PassMark (The more the better)

2592 2296

RAM Latency Calculator

Calculate Ram speed clock interval in nanosecond format

RAM 1

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns

RAM 2

CAS Latency (CL) *

Frequency (Mhz) *

Absolute Latency

0 ns